rdlc data matrix

rdlc data matrix

rdlc data matrix

rdlc data matrix

rdlc data matrix

rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,

rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,

rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,

rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,
rdlc data matrix,

The most obvious error in this step of building aggregate awareness is if the wrong table is used in any instance However, the ultimate goal is to get correct results So as a final test, you should run a query to ensure that you get the same data when either the aggregate table or the detail table is used In the preceding examples, Sales for September 2001 is $300,848, according to both the aggregate table and the SHOP_FACTS table There are a few reasons why you may not get the same result for an aggregate table as for a detail table: One of the tables is incorrect If the DBA has not built the aggregate table correctly, you may not be able to fix it, but you must communicate this issue to both DBAs and end users When something is wrong, BusinessObjects XI will always get the blame, because most end users don t know and don t care which component in the information flow actually has the problem If the summary table is incorrect in all circumstances, don t include it in the universe design If it is correct in most circumstances and the DBA is working to resolve one minor inconsistency, use the table but clearly explain in the object description when the data may be incorrect The aggregate table contains dimensional information that is different from details in the lookup or dimension tables As a general rule, I don t like when dimensional information is stored in the fact table It s even worse when there is a difference between dimensional information in a fact table and a dimension table Yes, in a perfect world the data is clean and consistent However, I ve yet to see a company that had such clean data In the example of AGG_YR_QT_MT_MN_WK_RG_ CY_SN_SR_QT_MA, the store name exists in both this aggregate fact table and the dimension table OUTLET_LOOKUP What if the fact table contained data for a store that did not exist in OUTLET_LOOKUP Users would get different answers between queries that use the aggregate table and queries that use the detail table that joins to the dimension table that is missing information for a store The universe contains a mistake in the join or in a dimension definition An error in the design is completely within your control and must be resolved before deploying to end users.

if(b==null) ConsoleWriteLine("The cast in b = (B) a is NOT allowed"); else ConsoleWriteLine("The cast in b = (B) a is allowed"); } }

Here is the output, which is the same as before:

Part II:

of a 3-story high, 90-foot-long newspaper printing press that runs at a production rate of 70,000 completely folded newspapers per hour This subassembly consists of the paperfolding cylinder (part 12) and the paper-cutting cylinder (part 52) These cylinders run at about 500 rpm Table 101 lists the number parts Incidentally, part 32 is the main drive shaft for the subassembly shown It connects to the various other series of drives in the press, making a complex system Note that in this mechanism a ywheel is not necessary since the two heavy cylinders act as their own ywheels

In this version, the as statement checks the validity of the cast and then, if valid, performs the cast, all in one statement

Although useful in their own ways, the as and is operators simply test the compatibility of two types Often, you will need to obtain information about a type To do this, C# supplies the typeof operator It retrieves a SystemType object for a given type Using this object, you can determine the type s characteristics The typeof operator has this general form: typeof(type) Here, type is the type being obtained The Type object returned encapsulates the information associated with type Once you have obtained a Type object for a given type, you can obtain information about it through the use of various properties, fields, and methods defined by Type Type is a large class with many members, and a discussion is deferred until the next section, where reflection is examined However, to briefly demonstrate Type, the following program uses three of its properties: FullName, IsClass, and IsAbstract To obtain the full name of the type, use FullName IsClass returns true if the type is a class IsAbstract returns true if a class is abstract